Revenue-Flow Priority

    Not all tests are equal. Stop treating them like they are.

    Tag flows by business impact. Revenue-critical paths get zero-tolerance flake handling on every PR. Low-impact flows run nightly. Your team triages what matters, not everything.

    Book a demo

    Who this is for

    Role
    Head of Engineering or Product lead
    Company
    E-commerce or SaaS with payment/checkout flows processing $10K+/day
    Trigger
    Engineers spend 30 minutes triaging a CI failure on the About page while a real checkout regression ships unnoticed.

    The pain is real

    “I deployed a new checkout flow on Friday afternoon at 4:47 PM. After 6 minutes Slack exploded. Payment processing broke and customers couldn't complete purchases.”

    DEV Communitysource

    “I tried to buy your product three times. Your site kept failing. I went to your competitor instead.”

    Optivem Journalsource

    Average payment incident costs $12K+ in failed transactions

    No testing tool differentiates execution priority by business impact

    Engineers waste triage time on low-impact failures while high-impact ones ship

    Why nobody else solves this

    Test execution is all-or-nothing today. Run the full suite or don't. Every failure gets the same red flag regardless of business impact.

    A flaky test on the About page creates the same CI alert as a genuine checkout regression. Engineers waste triage time on noise while critical bugs escape.

    Datadog has 'critical' synthetic monitors but doesn't tie them to PR-level testing. No tool lets you say 'checkout is tier-1 (every PR, zero tolerance), settings is tier-3 (nightly).'

    The workflow today vs. with Zerocheck

    Without Zerocheck

    CI runs 200 tests. 8 fail. Engineer investigates: 4 flakes on the marketing site, 2 on settings, 1 on admin, 1 on checkout. The checkout failure is at line 47 of the report. Engineer fixes the easy ones first. The checkout regression ships to production. $8K lost before anyone notices.

    With Zerocheck

    Same 8 failures. Zerocheck surfaces tier-1 first: 'CHECKOUT: 1 failure. Investigate immediately.' Tier-3 failures shown as informational, not blocking. Engineer sees the checkout issue in 30 seconds, fixes before merge. Revenue protected.

    How it works

    1

    Tag flows by business tier: checkout = tier-1, onboarding = tier-2, settings = tier-3

    2

    Tier-1 runs on every PR with zero tolerance for flakes

    3

    Tier-3 runs nightly, shown as informational when they fail

    4

    PR comments surface critical results first, not alphabetically

    Other use cases

    SOC 2 Evidence

    Every release produces an immutable evidence pack - no more death by screenshot.

    Zero to CI

    Connect your repo, get 20 tests in CI within the hour. No framework, no selectors, no QA hire.

    Checkout Guardian

    Guard the only code path where a bug is measured in lost dollars per minute.

    Not all tests are equal. Stop treating them like they are.

    A checkout failure should block the merge. A tooltip glitch should run nightly.

    Book a demo