End-to-end QA for your user journeys
Zerocheck opens your app in a hosted browser, steps through user journeys, fills forms, and records each run with screenshots, video, and step traces.
Starter kit
2 items - guest checkout
Discount
SPRING20
Safe card
4242 4242 4242
Checking discount, shipping, tax, and safe card in one browser run.
Recording 00:28 · Screenshots 6 · Step trace
For teams shipping with
Teams now build fast with Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, etc. You can't test every change by hand. Zerocheck fills that gap: it runs your flows in a real browser on every PR and monitors production for breakages.
of CI failures are flaky tests, not real bugs.
Google Testing Blog
of testing budget goes to maintaining brittle tests.
World Quality Report
What Zerocheck does

Zerocheck reads the PR and your app context, then suggests automated tests for the paths most likely to break.
See change-aware testing →
The approved suite runs in a real browser, and the recording, screenshots, step trace, and run evidence land where engineers already review code.
See run evidence →
Zerocheck finds elements by their text, visual placement and accessibility role, so tests keep working when the UI moves.
See zero-to-CI setup →
Approved critical tests keep running against production, so customer-facing regressions raise an alert with browser proof.
See production monitoring →How it works
Add the app or website your users depend on. No install required. Zerocheck opens it in a hosted browser and steps through the flow.
The agent explores your product, identifies important user journeys, and saves draft tests for your team to review, edit, and approve.
Connect GitHub to test feature branches and preview builds before merge. With repository access, Zerocheck can inspect the change and suggest new automated tests for affected journeys.
The same approved tests can keep running against production on a schedule, with recordings, screenshots, and step traces when something fails.

I spent years watching the same pattern repeat across teams: add Playwright tests → a redesign breaks half of them → nobody fixes the selectors → tests get commented out → production breaks six weeks later. The tests failed because they depended on selectors that changed during redesigns.
Zerocheck opens the app in a browser, uses the accessibility tree, and validates the action the user was trying to complete. It finds candidate journeys, drafts tests for review, and keeps approved checks running as the app changes. Every run produces a recording, screenshots, and a step trace that get posted back to the PR.
If that matches something you’re working on, start a QA run or reach out directly.
When a PR touches product behavior, Zerocheck reads the diff, identifies critical flows at risk, and suggests automated tests while context is fresh.
See change-aware testing →Point Zerocheck at staging, let it discover critical flows, review suggested tests, and start running browser QA checks without building Playwright infrastructure.
See zero-to-CI setup →Every QA run captures recording, screenshots, step trace, and commit-bound evidence so your team can trust what passed and what failed.
See run evidence →Unit tests catch code issues. They miss a broken checkout, or a CSS change that hides the buy button. The manual click-through your team still does is the QA run Zerocheck automates.
Wiring it into CI, writing selectors, and fixing them when the UI changes costs 20+ hours a week.
You get a recording, screenshots, and step trace posted on the PR while you’re still in the code. When something fails, you see the recording of what went wrong and the exact step that broke.
Playwright MCP gives your coding agent a browser. You still write the test logic, handle assertions, and wire it into CI yourself. Zerocheck reads your diff, suggests tests for review, runs your approved suite, monitors production, and posts results with recording, screenshots, and trace.
Watch the browser run your flows. When something breaks, you get the recording, screenshots, and step traces.