For Compliance Teams

    The 20% of SOC 2 evidence that Vanta can't automate

    Vanta automates 80% of compliance evidence. The remaining 20% is application-level testing proof that your team still assembles manually: screenshots, spreadsheets, Confluence pages. Zerocheck closes that gap automatically.

    Who this is for

    Role
    Compliance officer, CTO, or VP Engineering
    Company
    B2B SaaS (50-500 employees) going through SOC 2 Type II certification or renewal
    Trigger
    Audit window opens. Enterprise deal blocked pending SOC 2. Compliance officer sends the evidence request email. Two engineers disappear for two weeks.

    This is for you if:

    • SOC 2 Type II certification or renewal in the next 6 months
    • Currently collect application testing evidence manually
    • Core user flows are web-based (not purely API or native)
    • Merge multiple PRs per day with a GitHub-based workflow
    • Using or planning to use Vanta, Drata, or similar for infrastructure compliance

    The pain is real

    “The guts of a SOC2 audit are a giant spreadsheet questionnaire and a battery of screenshots serving as evidence for the answers in the questionnaire.”

    Thomas Ptacek, Fly.iosource

    “Evidence collection becomes a quarterly scavenger hunt - a tax on engineering velocity that produces almost no security value.”

    Ederasource

    “If your evidence collection process is 'take a screenshot on Tuesday,' your evidence is already stale by Wednesday.”

    Ederasource

    SOC 2 requires evidence for 200+ controls per audit cycle

    Vanta and Drata leave a '20% manual gap' for application-level testing evidence

    2 engineers x 2 weeks per audit for manual evidence collection

    Why nobody else solves this

    Compliance platforms (Vanta, Drata, Secureframe) automate infrastructure evidence. They can confirm 'MFA is enabled.' They cannot prove 'the login flow actually works on this commit.'

    No E2E testing tool generates audit-ready artifacts. CI logs expire. Dashboards aren't formatted for auditors. The bridge between 'test passed' and 'auditable proof' is entirely manual.

    The result: 2 engineers spend 2 weeks per audit mapping Jira tickets to test runs to screenshots to Confluence. 200 pages assembled. The auditor flags gaps. Repeat annually.

    The workflow today vs. with Zerocheck

    Without Zerocheck

    SOC 2 audit window opens. Compliance officer asks for evidence of change management controls (CC7.2, CC8.1). Engineering team manually maps Jira tickets to test runs to screenshots. Two engineers spend two weeks assembling 200 pages. Auditor flags gaps: some controls lack continuous evidence, some show point-in-time screenshots.

    With Zerocheck

    Tests tagged with control IDs run on every PR. Every merge generates a signed, timestamped evidence artifact: test name, control ID, pass/fail, commit SHA, screenshots. Compliance officer opens dashboard, selects CC7.2, clicks export. PDF generated in seconds. Two-week sprint becomes a two-hour review.

    How it works

    1

    Tag tests with SOC 2 control IDs (CC7.2, CC6.1, CC8.1)

    2

    Tests run on every PR, generating evidence artifacts automatically

    3

    Evidence accumulates continuously, not once a quarter

    4

    Export auditor-ready PDF/JSON in one click

    FAQ

    We already use Vanta/Drata. Why add Zerocheck?

    Vanta automates infrastructure evidence: MFA enabled, access reviews completed, encryption configured. Zerocheck automates application testing evidence: login flow works, access controls behave correctly, change management tested. Together you cover the full 100%, not just 80%.

    Our auditor has never seen AI-generated evidence.

    The evidence is not AI-generated. It is the factual output of real test execution: timestamped pass/fail, screenshots, step traces, commit SHA. The AI writes the tests. The evidence is what happened when those tests ran. Same standard as CI logs, formatted for auditors.

    How long does it take to set up evidence generation?

    Two minutes to connect your repo and staging URL. Tag tests with SOC 2 control IDs. Evidence starts generating on your next PR. Most teams go from zero to continuous evidence in under an hour.

    Is the evidence legally defensible?

    Evidence artifacts are timestamped, commit-bound, and immutable. They include the test specification, execution result, screenshots, and the exact commit SHA. We recommend auditor review of the format before your first audit.

    The 20% of SOC 2 evidence that Vanta can't automate

    E2E testing built for audit season. Evidence on every PR, not once a quarter.

    Book a demo