Growth-stage teams know they need tests. They don't have 6 months to build Playwright infrastructure or $96K/year for QA Wolf. Protect the flows that drive activation, revenue, and retention before the next incident.
“I inherited 10,000 lines of code with zero tests. No documentation. No comments. Just spaghetti code from a developer who quit 3 years ago.”
Medium / Let's Code Futuresource
“In the rush to get stuff out, time-consuming things get skipped like user testing, automation, analytics, monitoring, and manual testing.”
The Pragmatic Engineersource
42% of developers aren't comfortable writing automation scripts
41% of committed code is now AI-generated, but test coverage is declining
QA Wolf charges ~$96K/year. One buyer reported an 800% pricing increase at renewal.
Playwright is free but takes 2-6 months of infrastructure work before you get meaningful coverage. 55% of teams spend 20+ hours/week on maintenance once they do.
QA Wolf covers creation and maintenance through a managed QA team, but it costs $96K/year and their team owns your tests. One buyer reported an 800% pricing increase at renewal.
AI code generation means teams write 3x more code with less test coverage. 41% of committed code is AI-generated, and teams need test coverage that keeps up without adding another maintenance backlog.
New engineering lead joins a 25-person startup. 40K lines of code, zero E2E tests. Evaluates Playwright: Day 1 is npm install + config. Day 2 is a login test that breaks on OAuth. Week 2: selectors break on a CSS refactor. Week 4: 5 tests exist, 3 engineers are frustrated. The initiative dies.
Start with the production URL. Zerocheck finds candidate journeys and saves suggested tests as browser-step specs. Engineer reviews and approves the tests that should run. Connect GitHub when the approved suite is ready for future PRs and diff-based test suggestions.
Start from the production app your users already rely on
Find the high-risk paths your team cannot afford to break
Review generated coverage before it joins the PR gate
Give engineers PR comments with the evidence needed to fix failures
Other tools document their own platform controls. Zerocheck produces JSON evidence from your executed application tests.
Get coverage on the flows customers will notice when they break, without turning testing into a quarter-long infrastructure project.
Guard the only code path where a bug is measured in lost dollars per minute.
No. Zerocheck interacts with your app, finds candidate journeys, and generates tests for review. Approved generated tests then run on GitHub PRs alongside human-authored tests.
QA Wolf deploys a managed team to write and maintain your tests at roughly $96K per year. One buyer reported an 800% pricing increase at renewal. Zerocheck is self-serve: your team stays in control, and Zerocheck suggests tests from PR diffs for review.
Yes. 41% of committed code is now AI-generated, but test coverage is declining. Your coding agent writes features; Zerocheck interacts with the app, generates test suggestions for review, and runs approved tests on PRs and monitors.
Keep them. Zerocheck adds change-aware test generation and visual interaction on top. Your existing tests still run. Zerocheck helps fill coverage gaps and reduce selector maintenance.
E2E testing for teams that ship fast without a QA department.
Get a demo