# Give reviewers an inspectable record of browser testing

Zerocheck helps engineers explain a release test with its exact steps, screenshots and result. Compliance interpretation remains with your own review process.

Zerocheck helps engineers explain a release test with its exact steps, screenshots and result. Compliance interpretation remains with your own review process.

## Who it is for

- Role: Engineering lead working with a reviewer
- Company: Teams documenting their release process
- Trigger: Someone asks for the test behind a release decision

## Why this is underserved

- Test evidence needs the right environment and test revision.
- A screenshot alone does not establish a control operated effectively.
- Audit mappings and access governance are separate requirements.

## The workflow

Before: A reviewer gets an image of a green dashboard without the expected outcome or the test that produced it.

After: An engineer opens the specific run and explains which browser outcome it verified. The reviewer decides whether that record is relevant to their request.

## How Zerocheck handles it

1. Identify the exact flow that needs testing.
2. Run it with a test account and review its assertions.
3. Use the web app or CLI JSON output to inspect the record.
4. Apply your own access, recordkeeping and review requirements.

## Good fit when

- A web app and a repeatable user flow
- A test environment, test accounts and an explicit expected outcome

## Frequently asked questions

### Is Zerocheck a compliance platform?

No. It does not provide certification, control mappings, audit exports or compliance scores.

### Does the current offering include SSO and role-based access?

No. Access is provisioned for the evaluation; discuss your access requirements before adopting it.

---
Canonical: https://tryzerocheck.com/use-cases/for-compliance-teams/
Updated: 2026-09-14